͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 
Is this email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
Image description

We  are in the final  stretch! The deadline for comments on the Nuclear Waste Management Organization's "Initial Project Description" is 11:59 pm Wednesday.  It's important that you get comments in by that time - they can be long and complex or short and to the point!  What matters most is that the Impact Assessment Agency hears from you by the deadline! Your voice matters.

KEY MESSAGES

  • NWMO’S “Deep Geological Repository project” must be designated for a full impact assessment and public hearing

  • Transportation must be included in the impact assessment

  • A thorough examination of alternatives to the project and alternative means of carrying out the project must be included in the impact assessment

  • The Initial Project Description fails to provide the necessary information about the NWMO’s project; a detailed project description is necessary


COMMON QUESTIONS

How do I submit comments? 

You can use the online "portal" on the Impact Assessment Agency web site (step-by-step instructions are provided HERE) or you can  send your comments by email to [email protected]  

What should I include in my comments?

In addition to the key messages your comments should express any other concerns you have with the NWMO's project and your criticisms of the project description. View a starter list of  issues HERE; choose one or more and comment on why it is important to be included in the impact assessment and whether the NWMO provided enough information in their "initial project description"

How should I organize my comments?

There's no right or wrong  way. You can view a suggested format HERE and a template letter HERE

The draft list of issues, format and template letter are for suggestions and ideas only. (links below).

Your unique comments are the most effective contribution for this comment period.

Check Out the Public Comments!

Public Comments on Registry

The number of comments is growing rapidly, but as of noon Sunday (Feb 1) there are 268 submissions posted. The links below are to a sampling: 


Regional and National Media Coverage

As with our "sampling" of public comments, the following links to recent media coverage is incomplete, mostly because of the volume of coverage. Check them out!

Public invited to comment on NWMO project, Sioux Bulletin

First Nation says nuclear site review could ‘prejudice’ legal case, The Narhwal

Authorities say they can’t extend 1st nuclear site comment period, NWONews

What Canada's Nuclear Waste Plan means for New Brunswick, NB Media Co-op

Ontario's proposed nuclear waste repository poses millennia-long ethical questions, The Conversation

Full IPDSummary IPD10 page IPDPublic CommentsAll Records

KEY FACTS

  • A federal review of the Nuclear Waste Management Organization’s (NWMO) “Adaptive Phased Management Project” commenced on January 5th, and the public has just 30 days to review an “initial project description”. The public comment period will close at 11:59 pm on Wednesday, February 4th.

  • The NWMO’s plan is to transport, process and bury all of Canada’s nuclear fuel waste at a site between Ignace and Dryden in northwestern Ontario. The project will include 50 years of transporting highly radioactive waste with average transportation distances of 1,800 km per trip (1,700 from Ontario reactors).  The 160 years of operation will place 150,000 tonnes of the radioactive waste underground in the headwaters of the Wabigoon River watersheds.

  • NWMO has selected a site between Ignace and Dryden in northwestern Ontario, in the heart of Treaty 3 territory. The NWMO has deemed only Wabigoon Lake Ojibway Nation and the Township of Ignace to be “host communities”.

  • The Township of Ignace is 45 km east of the site and in a different watershed; there are other communities closer by and hundreds of communities along the transportation route and downstream from the site who the NWMO has not included in their decision to select the Revell site.

  • The NWMO describes the Revell site as being “in the territory of Wabigoon Lake Ojibway Nation” but there are several other Treaty 3 Nations who are also in relationship with the land NWMO has selected.  Treaty 3 Chiefs in Assembly have expressed their opposition, as have Nishnawbi Aski Nation, Anishnabek Nation and Chiefs of Ontario. 

  • The NWMO project will generate radioactive releases at each stage,  from transportation to when the wastes are eventually abandoned underground

  • There is no operating deep geological repository (DGR) for high-level nuclear waste  anywhere in the world; there are project in Finland  and Sweden under development but no DGR has received final approval or begun to operate


Clock is Running on Nuclear Waste Project Comment Period

We are in the final stretch of the 30 day comment period on the Nuclear Waste Management Organization's radioactive waste transportation and burial scheme. The federal review commenced on January 5th, and the public has until February 4th to comment on the NWMO's "Initial Project Description. 


The 1,233-page document and a 92-page summary are available on the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada’s website. 

There is  also a 10 page  summary at the beginning of both the full and the summary IPD. That "summary of the summary" is good starting point in reading the NWMO's project description. Consider starting with the 10  page version and then going to the sections you wish to comment on in the longer version. 

A key concern is that the NWMO is pushing to exclude long-distance transportation, despite the Impact Assessment Act’s requirement that activities integral to a project be included in its assessment. 

Additional action tools and supporting information including links to register for We the Nuclear Free North's January 28th webinar and to the Impact Assessment Agency's project page and documents are available on WTNFN’s webpage: www.wethenuclearfreenorth.ca/impacts/

Read our January 7 bulletin HERE

Read our January 7 News Release HERE

Read our January 26 News Release HERE

Visit our web page HERE

Read comments on the registry HERE

Register for our January 28 webinar HERE

Send an email to the Impact Assessment Agency using the email [email protected] to be added to the Agency's notice list. 

Full IPDSummary IPD10 page IPDPublic CommentsAll Records

In July We the Nuclear Free North produced 3 short "explainer" videos to provide background, context and analysis for the NWMO's false start to the federal review.   

Image description

We the Nuclear Free North is an alliance of people and groups opposing a Deep Geological Repository for nuclear waste in Northern Ontario. We oppose the transport, burial and abandonment of this radioactive waste in our northern watersheds.



Our alliance is honoured to have received the name Tataganobin: looking far ahead into the future. Learn more about who we are, and the origin and meaning of this name.

Follow us on social media! From Facebook to TikTok, Instagram to Twitter, you'll find us there! Click below.

Would Your Group Like to Host a Presentation?

You can request volunteers from We the Nuclear Free North to do a presentation (Zoom or in-person) for your private or public group. Get in touch!

Email: [email protected] , or call: 1-855-225-8055 (toll free).

Thank you for your support!

Financial donations are always appreciated. You can send your donation by Interac to email [email protected], through our GoFundMe account, or through our charitable partner (be sure to use the menu to identify We the Nuclear Free North as the intended recipient of your donation). 

Box Box 10012, Thunder Bay, ON, P7B 6T6

1 855 225 8055

(toll free)

If you would like to unsubscribe, please click here.