If Donald Trump taught us anything it is that you can lie to a impressionable populace and they will believe you just because you said so.
This is the case for the arguments for harm reduction and safe injection sites. They lie to convince us that the sites have no negative impact on our communities and only positive impacts on substance abusers.
Widely reported the week of November 13, 2023, a new study by Aaron Chalfin, PhD1; Brandon del Pozo, PhD, MPA, MA2; David Mitre-Becerril, PhD3 found “no significant changes were detected in violent crimes or property crimes”.
For those of us not paying attention, this news might seem to garner our support for these sites and contradicts what community groups like GHC, HNBA, and MMPCIA have been saying.
What it does is validate what the community groups have been saying – for the last 50+ years. Let’s look at the bold sentence above. 11 words. Let’s start with the word significant. Who defines what is significant? The study authors? Have they even been to the square block area between 125th street and 126th street between Park and Lexington. And what crimes fall under violent or property crimes? Is that misdemeanors, felonies?
There is a very simple reason there has not been a “significant” increase. For the last 50+ years the oversaturation of drug treatment, harm reduction and homeless shelters have elevated the crime in our neighborhood that would not exist without these facilities. The OnPoint location on 126th street was a needle exchange facility before evolving into injection site. Changing a needle exchange site to an injection site does not change the population of users and dealers that congregate, use, and sell. CRIME HASN’T GONE UP “SIGNIFICANTLY” BECAUSE IT IS ALREADY HIGH. Put that injection site on the UES and evaluate crime in the next year.
Why are we even talking about crime? We are talking about fair share. I don’t care if crime went to zero. Spread these sites around, and not just in predominantly Black and Brown neighborhoods.
-- Maria G.