"This decision puts the people of Grassy Narrows in grave danger. The transport of extremely dangerous nuclear waste and its disposal within our watershed will do irreparable destruction to our lands, rivers, and our way of life, which have already been damaged by so many harmful decisions imposed on us. It is we, who live downstream, and our future generations who will be harmed yet again against our will and for the benefit of others. Grassy Narrows has been clear that we say no to nuclear waste disposal and we will fight this callous disregard for our safety, our self determination and our collective rights as First Nations people."
Joseph Fobister, Grassy Narrows' Land Protection Team Lead
"The NWMO has not received the consent they asserted all these years that they required - in their oft-repeated words, "a robust expression of community willingness." What they did receive, from WLON, is conditional willingness - the consent only to move to the next step of investigations, but not to site the underground repository in NW Ontario. Thus, the industry has simply pivoted and jumped to a site selection announcement, for publicity purposes, regardless of the failure of their siting process to meet its own requirements. We have come to expect this level of disingenuous public behaviour from the NWMO."
Wendy O’Connor, We the Nuclear Free North volunteer
“It was a last-minute sleight of hand by the NWMO. After 15 years of saying they would only proceed with an informed and willing host, and only after that potential host had made what the NWMO described as a compelling demonstration of willingness, the NWMO changed the game. It is no longer about willingness to host the project, it’s about willingness to continue in the NWMO study process. They still don’t have a willing host.”
Brennain Lloyd, Northwatch Project Coordinator, volunteer with We the Nuclear Free North
“The NWMO announcement demonstrates the fickleness of the NWMO’s site selective process. It allows the NWMO to manufacture something they are calling consent, without actually gaining consent. They were looking for consent for their project – the transportation, processing and burial of all of Canada’s high-level waste in the heart of Treaty 3 territory. The closest they could get from Wabigoon Lake Ojibway Nation was consent to continue in the site characterization process. It’s a small victory which they are going to play big.”
Charles Faust, Nuclear Free Thunder Bay spokesperson, volunteer with We the Nuclear Free North
"Naturally, I am quite disappointed and somewhat surprised that the NWMO has selected the Revell Site in Northwestern Ontario as the location where they will bury all of Canada’s accumulated high-level radioactive nuclear waste. It was only last week that we read an official statement from Wabigoon Lake Ojibway Nation stating that the “yes" vote in their referendum did not signify that they were consenting to the project. It is deeply problematical that NWMO has been given a free license to design its own site selection process without any government oversight. They have always said they would only proceed with consent from willing and informed hosts. Now they seem to be going ahead without that consent. In addition to the NWMO’s lack of consultation with all of the communities impacted by their decision, there seems to be a lack of integrity in their process. There has been considerable opposition from First Nations, leading environmentalists, environmental organizations and ordinary citizens in Northern Ontario but our concerns have been dismissed. Our position has been and continues to be that the longterm storage of nuclear waste should be managed as close to the nuclear generation stations as possible. Looking forward, we will continue to voice our opposition in the Impact Assessment process."
Mary Veltri, Environment North board member, We the Nuclear Free North volunteer