Is this email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
Image description

September 2020

SEFI Ethics Special Interest Group Newsletter

The Ethics SIG Newsletter is issued 8 times per year and aims to share information on cutting edge engineering ethics research and practices. If you would like to join the mailing list please use the form on the SEFI Ethics SIG website.


If you would like to propose an item for the newsletter, please contact [email protected] or [email protected].

Teaching Engineering Ethics Online: Between Adaptation and Transformation

The SEFI Ethics SIG Working Group organised an online workshop on “Teaching Engineering Ethics Online: Between Adaptation and Transformation” on 9 September 2020. 51 people from all five continents joined the session which saw five thought-provoking presentations discussed.

Justin Hess (Purdue University, USA) in his presentation “Considerations for teaching engineering ethics in an online modality”explained how he used backward design to focus on empathy in his ethics online courses. In recent research, Justin and his colleagues found that students scored higher on ethical reasoning (measured by the EERI, Engineering Ethical Reasoning Instrument), but had lower satisfaction. This made him conclude that most ‘in-class’ instructional and assessment strategies are directly transferrable to online modalities. One critical consideration, however, is lower scores on interactivity. Students may feel isolated in online settings, so find ways for students to interact with their peers and to develop a sense of community.


Maha Bali (University of Cairo, Egypt) explained two methods that are applicable online to raise student involvement online. “Theatre of the Oppressed” is a theatre technique or a game that seeks to motivate people, restore true dialogue, and create space for participants to rehearse taking action. It brings engineering students in a practice case and asks them to play how the case works out. Maha also explained a huge menu of “Liberating Structures” options. Liberating structures are easy-to-learn microstructures that enhance relational coordination and trust quickly fostering lively participation. She practiced the “TRIZ Process”: (1) Make a list of all you can do to make sure that you achieve the worst result imaginable. (2) Go down the list and ask yourself “Are we doing this right now?” and make a list of all your counterproductive activities. (3) Decide first steps to answer the second list. More on https://oneheglobal.org/equity-unbound.  Maha’s presentation is available here.


Gabriel Burks (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA) in “Using human-centered design in online teaching and engineering ethics instruction” showed how he and his colleagues brought in new local environments. They for example used TikTok and measuring movement devices to compare each other dancing styles in a biomedical technology course. He concluded that, by providing learners with a framework for local environments engagement, a new level of concept negotiation and a more contextualized presentation of STEM theory can e attained within virtual teaching and learning spaces. When applied to engineering ethics, this will inevitably strengthen their connection to those who are generally impacted by their decisions. When this occurs, engineers experience a shift from viewing ethics as a series of general best practices to fully embodying what it means to be a responsible human that other humans rely on. Important Lesson learnt: keep the focus on students, also in developing (not what works best for teacher). Gabriel’s presentation is available here.  More on https://news.illinois.edu/view/6367/576642497


Kristina Masuwa-Morgan (University of Greenwich, UK) in “Metering out the Sustainable futures agenda in engineering education” discussed the sustainability literacy tool Sulitest and in particular the Engineering Sustainable Development mapping tool. This easy rubric makes it possible to analyse global citizenship, environmental stewardship, social justice-ethics-well being, and futures thinking in different phases of the course or curriculum design like prospectus, website, or program communication. She illustrated how she uses the Sulitest measures online. Students do the quiz on Sulitest. Four factors emerge for the students: knowledge ecosystems; knowledge on global-local human constructed systems; knowledge on role to play, individual and systemic change; and knowledge on transition towards sustainability). After that, students are graded on the self-reflection that they learn from this. So, the quiz itself is formative, the self-reflection is summative.


Iain Skinner (UNSW Sydney, Australia) talked about “Whole of class reflection on ethics prompted by online data collection”. In a first example, Iain described how students had to make 6 pairwise comparisons between 4 sustainability criteria (environmental, social, cultural and economic). Analytic design hierarchy provided preferences to weightings of relative importance. The results were then used to discuss conceptualization (What does “cultural” mean?), often for students already difficult to accept that different conceptualizations can exist next to each other; to discuss differences in average between criteria; and to discuss large spread, for example of the criterion “economic”. Another example asked students to choose one out of four applications to join project team and asked to rank them. One group received names (referring to gender or ethnicity), the other group received them de-identified. The strong differences indicate prejudices in the student group. In both cases, Iain concludes, students are surprised (and surprised that they are surprised); they accept the topic as valid given the results and the variations; and they start reflecting on themselves and their fellow group members raising self-awareness.Share

Engineering Ethics at SEFI 2020

There are nine ethics events on the SEFI 2020 Annual Conference, to be held online from 20th to 24th September. 


We want to draw your attention in particular to the Special Interest Group Ethics meeting on Monday 4:30pm. Here we will join with all of those interested in “ethics in engineering education” to analyse needs in ethics education and plan events for the upcoming academic year.

Image description

Sustainability and ethics themes are also more represented in other conference sessions, all of which can be easily found using the ‘track finder’ on the right of the conference programme page. For further details see the conference programme here

Open calls - Upcoming events

The Association for Practical and Professional Ethics (APPE) 30th anniversary annual international conference

25 -27 February 2021 (online)

Call for papers open (deadline 18 September 2020)

Special Issue “Engineering Ethics: Bridging the Theory-Practice Gap”, International Journal of Technoethics

Call for papers open (deadline 1 December 2020)

Special Issue Teaching philosophy of science to students from other disciplines”, European Journal of Philosophy of Science

Call for papers open (deadline 1 December 2020)

The Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference Education for a Sustainable Future.

21-24 October 2020, Uppsala, Sweden (online)

Registration open (deadline 20 June 2020)

Recent webinars

During the summer months, Aditya Johri (George Mason University), editor of the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education research, organized the webinars series CHEER UP - Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, having as guests authors of the contributions in the handbook. The video recordings are available at: https://bit.do/cheerupvideos

University of Michigan is hosting during the autumn semester the Engineering Education Research Seminars. For more information about the upcoming speakers and registration details: https://ieee-edusociety.org/educational-activities/webinars

News and initiatives

The National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science put out a call to its membership of over 15,000 case study teachers in STEM soliciting submissions of case studies on the topic of COVID-19. We are now in the process of having those cases peer-reviewed and then published on our website. So far, we have published 11 COVID-19 cases studies. For more information about submission and available cases click here

The International Journal of Service Learning in Engineering has a new Editor-in-Chief, Angela Bielefeldt (University of Colorado, Boulder). In the letter of the Editor, Prof. Bielefeldt welcomed ideas for future special issues. A special issue associated with the Engineering Community Engagement and Service Learning Workshop in July 2020, was postponed to 2021. Read more

Recent articles and publications

Building students’ nascent understanding of ethics in engineering practice - link

Author(s): Valentine, A.; Lowenhoff, S.; Marinelli, M., Male, S. & Hassan, G.M.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION

Development of contemporary engineering graduate attributes through open-ended problems and activities - link

Author(s): Gutiérrez Ortiz, F.J.; Fitzpatrick, J.J.; Byrne, E.P.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION

Empathy and ethical becoming in biomedical engineering education: a mixed methods study of an animal tissue harvesting laboratory - link

Author(s): Hess, J.L.; Miller, S.; Higbee, S.; Fore, G.A.; Wallace, J.S.

AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION

Authentic process safety decisions in an engineering ethics context: expression of student moral development within surveys and immersive environments - link

Author(s): Stransky, J.; Bodnar, C.A.; Cooper, M.; Anastasio, D.; Burkey, D.

AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION

2020: Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) Conference - link

Connecting to the Heart: Teaching Value-Based Professional Ethics - link

Author(s): Snieder, R.; Zhu, Q.

SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS

Exploratory Investigation of Personal Influences on Educators’ Engagement in Engineering Ethics and Societal Impacts Instruction - link

Author(s): Polmear, M.; Bielefeldt, A.R.; Knight, D.; Swan, C; Canney, N

SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS

The Boeing 737 MAX: Lessons for Engineering Ethics - link

Author(s): Herkert, J., Borenstein, J. & Miller, K.

SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS

Educating Civil Engineering Students about Ethics and Societal Impacts via Cucurricular Activities - link

Author(s): Bielefeldt, A.R.; Lewis, J.; Polmear, M., Knight, D; Canney, N; Swan, C

JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING EDUCATION

The lost moral purpose of science education - link

Author(s): Rudolph, J.L

SCIENCE EDUCATION

Ethics in cybersecurity research and practice - link
Author(s): Macnish, K.; van der Ham, J.
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY

Many Facets of Imagination: What Really Matters in Engineering Ethics Instruction? Presented at the 2020 ASEE's Virtual Conference - link
Author(s): Jalali, Y.; Civjan, S.A.
2020 ASEE'S VIRTUAL CONFERENCE

Teaching Ethics and Sustainability to Informatics Engineering Students, An Almost 30 Years’ Experience - link
Author(s): Casañ, M.J.; Alier, M.; Llorens, A.
SUSTAINABILITY

SEFI thanks its corporate partners for their support:

Image description
Image description
Image description

SEFI aisbl

39, rue des Deux Eglises
1000 Brussels

Facebookicon
Twittericon
Instagramicon

[email protected]

+32 2 502 36 09
www.sefi.be

Data protection policy for our MembersStakeholder ContactsSuppliersEmployees

If you want to unsubscribe, click here.
Sender.net